Tag Archive: united states

Despite all the warnings and admonitions in the Bible. “Christendom” throughout the centuries has engaged in persecuting God’s chosen in His name.  The demon seed of Antisemitism lives on; and is on the increase in Europe, aided by multiculturalism, and an abysmal failure to recognize the dangers posed by unfettered Muslim immigration.  Islam has, at their core, always sought to annihilate Israel.  America is NOT innocent in this attitude:

American attitudes towards Jews

Antisemitism in the United States was also indicated by national public opinion polls taken from the mid nineteen thirties to the late nineteen forties. The results showed that over half the American population saw Jews as greedy and dishonest. These polls also found that many Americans believed that Jews were too powerful in the United States. Similar polls were also taken, one of which posed that 35–40 percent of the population was prepared to accept an anti-Jewish campaign.

In a 1938 poll, approximately 60 percent of the respondents held a low opinion of Jews, labeling them “greedy,” “dishonest,” and “pushy.”[24] 41 percent of respondents agreed that Jews had “too much power in the United States,” and this figure rose to 58 percent by 1945. In 1939 a Roper poll found that only thirty-nine percent of Americans felt that Jews should be treated like other people. Fifty-three percent believed that “Jews are different and should be restricted” and ten percent believed that Jews should be deported.[25] Several surveys taken from 1940 to 1946 found that Jews were seen as a greater threat to the welfare of the United States than any other national, religious, or racial group.[26]

 – Courtesy of Wikipedia –

“Antisemitism in the United States”










KKK: Nazi salute and  Holocaust denial

“History of the Jews in the United States”

In the mid-1600s, Peter Stuyvesant, the last Dutch Director-General of the colony of New Amsterdam, sought to bolster the position of the Dutch Reformed Church by trying to reduce religious competition from denominations such as Jews, Lutherans, Catholics and Quakers. He stated that the Jews were “deceitful”, “very repugnant”, and “hateful enemies and blasphemers of the name of Christ”. He warned in a subsequent letter that in “giving them liberty we cannot (then) refuse the Lutherans and Papists”. However, religious plurality was already a legal-cultural tradition in New Amsterdam and in the Netherlands. His superiors at the Dutch West India Company in Amsterdam overruled him in all matters of intolerance.

In 1939 a Roper poll found that only thirty-nine percent of Americans felt that Jews should be treated like other people. Fifty-three percent believed that “Jews are different and should be restricted” and ten percent believed that Jews should be deported.[30] Several surveys taken from 1940 to 1946 found that Jews were seen as a greater threat to the welfare of the United States than any other national, religious, or racial group. [4] It has been estimated that 190,000 – 200,000 Jews could have been saved during the Second World War had it not been for bureaucratic obstacles to immigration deliberately created by Breckinridge Long and others.

In a speech at an America First rally on September 11, 1941 in Des Moines, Iowa entitled “Who Are the War Agitators?”, Charles Lindbergh claimed that three groups had been “pressing this country toward war”: the Roosevelt Administration, the British, and the Jews – and complained about what he insisted was the Jews’ “large ownership and influence in our motion pictures, our press, our radio and our government.” [32] The antisemitism of Lindbergh is one of the subjects of the novel The Plot Against America (2004) by Philip Roth.

Unofficial antisemitism was also widespread in the first half of the century. For example, to limit the growing number of Jewish students between 1919-1950s a number of private liberal arts universities and medical and dental schools employed Numerus clausus. These included Harvard University, Columbia University, Cornell University, and Boston University[citation needed]. In 1925 Yale University, which already had such admissions preferences as “character”, “solidity”, and “physical characteristics” added a program of legacy preference admission spots for children of Yale alumni, in an explicit attempt to put the brakes on the rising percentage of Jews in the student body. This was soon copied by other Ivy League and other schools[citation needed], and admissions of Jews were kept down to 10% through the 1950s. Such policies were for the most part discarded during the early 1960s.

Some cults also support conspiracy theories regarding Jews as dominating and taking over the world. These cults are often vitriolic and severely anti-semitic. For instance, the Necedah Shrine Cult from the 1950s on to the mid-1980s, has Mary Ann Van Hoof receiving antisemitic “visions” from the Virgin Mary telling her that the Rothschilds, a prominent Jewish banking family, are “mongrel yids(Jews)” bent on dominating the entire world economy through international banking. Most of the worlds problems, from poverty to world wars, are the cause of International Banking Jews and their “satanic secret society,” according to Van Hoof.[5]

American antisemitism underwent a modest revival in the late twentieth century. The Nation of Islam under Louis Farrakhan claimed that Jews were responsible for slavery, economic exploitation of black labor, selling alcohol and drugs in their communities, and unfair domination of the economy. Jesse Jackson issued his infamous “Hymietown” remarks during the 1984 Presidential primary campaign.

According to ADL surveys begun in 1964, African-Americans are “significantly more likely” than white Americans to hold antisemitic beliefs, although there is a strong correlation between education level and the rejection of anti-Semitic stereotypes.[33]


Empowering Islamic extremists to achieve questionable short-term goals does not serve America’s long-term security or interests.
Nor does it serve the interests of nearly 2 million Christians in Syria who fear they could suffer the same fate as Iraqi Christians who were abused and expelled from that country as radical Islamic forces gained influence and power.
History’s primary lesson is that we must learn from the past.
Although there are some well-intentioned reasons for wanting to intervene in Syria, there are far more well-documented reasons not to.
Please read my op-ed published this week at CNN below.
In Liberty, Senator Rand Paul


Helping Syrian rebels a dangerous risk
By Rand Paul, Special to CNN

(CNN) — The United States has a history of often picking sides in Middle East conflicts to its own detriment.
In the 1980s, former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld met with Saddam Hussein to establish a relationship that helped the dictator gain access to American arms during Iraq’s war with Iran.  In the 1990s, the U.S. would drive former ally Hussein from Kuwait and impose a decade of sanctions that were devastating for Iraqis, but had little effect on the dictator.  In 2003, we went to Iraq, overthrew Hussein, and became part of nation-building effort from which we only recently saw most of our soldiers return home.

Arguably one of the greatest beneficiaries of the Iraq war was Iran, which now enjoys more power and influence with the elimination of its historic enemy.  President George H.W. Bush did not pursue Hussein directly during Operation Desert Storm precisely because he feared the destabilizing effects it might have on the region, or as his Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney explained in 1994, “Once you got to Iraq and took it over, took down Saddam Hussein’s government, then what are you going to put in its place?”  Today, Iraq is unstable and its future uncertain.

Moammar Gadhafi eventually accepted responsibility in the 1988 bombing of an airplane over Lockerbie, Scotland, that killed hundreds of people, including American schoolchildren.

President Reagan called Gadhafi the “mad dog of the Middle East.”

Fast forward to 2008, when Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice traveled to Libya to meet with Gadhafi to offer American support.

In 2009, members of the U.S. Senate — Republicans Lindsey Graham and John McCain and an independent, Joe Lieberman — would travel to Libya to meet with Gadhafi to offer further aid.  Sen. McCain said: “We discussed the possibility of moving ahead with the provision of nonlethal defense equipment to the government of Libya.”  President Obama would eventually meet with Gadhafi to reconfirm the same relationship established during the Bush administration.

By 2011, President Obama was arming Libyan rebels and ordering airstrikes to overthrow Gadhafi.  Some of the president’s most vocal supporters were the same Republicans who traveled to Libya two years before to help Libya’s strongman acquire military equipment.  Sen. McCain said of the Libyan rebels: “I have met with these brave fighters, and they are not al Qaeda. … To the contrary: They are Libyan patriots who want to liberate their nation. We should help them do it.”

We did help them, something I opposed on the Senate floor as an unconstitutional overreach by the executive branch.  We now have reason to believe that the Libyan rebels did contain elements of al Qaeda and other Islamic extremists.

Now we see the same enthusiasm for another U.S. intervention, this time in Syria.  The Syria Transition Support Act approved last week by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, of which I am a member, has the potential to create more problems for the United States than it would solve.  It is unclear what national security interests we have in the civil war in Syria.  It is very clear that any attempt to aid the Syrian rebels would be complicated and dangerous, precisely because we don’t know who these people are.

The situation in Syria is certainly dire.  At least 70,000 people have died, and al Qaeda is making confirmed inroads into the country.  No one wants to see Syria become a bastion of extremism.  But like other American interventions in the past, U.S. involvement could actually help the extremists.

There is also the quandary of nearly 2 million Christians who are uncertain of what to do.  The Christian community in Syria has traditionally sided with, and been protected by, Bashar al-Assad’s regime.  It is troubling to think that American arms may be given to Islamic fighters who may in turn be firing them at Christians.

This month, it was reported that the al Qaeda-linked Nusra Front in Syria executed 11 men who were part of al-Assad’s forces.  Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad is no friend to the U.S. — but neither is al Qaeda.  To aid members of al Qaeda in any way, directly or indirectly, is an insult to our brave men and women who’ve been fighting these terrorists since 9/11.

Perhaps the most dangerous aspect of this “transition support act” is that it would commit the United States to a leadership position in the restoration of Syria, and is very vague about what that looks like.
The language of “capacity building” contained in this act is an open-ended term that if logically followed, could eventually mean U.S. troops on the ground in Syria.

We “capacity built” in both Iraq and Afghanistan.  Those who insist this language could never mean U.S. boots on the ground in Syria belong to the same Washington clique eager to support Hussein, Ghadafi and later, the Libyan rebels.  Washington is not exempt from the law of unintended consequences.

Empowering Islamic extremists to achieve questionable short-term goals does not serve America’s long-term security or interests.  Nor does it serve the interests of nearly 2 million Christians in Syria who fear they could suffer the same fate as Iraqi Christians who were abused and expelled from that country as radical Islamic forces gained influence and power.

These Christians are natural allies of the United States, and if we’re going to seriously discuss any American interests in Syria, the welfare of these Christians is more important than arming Islamic extremists.

History’s primary lesson is that we must learn from the past. Although there are some well-intentioned reasons for wanting to intervene in Syria, there are far more well-documented reasons not to.
Click here to view the article at CNN.


This is a very timely post!

12 Blatant Examples of The New World Order Openly Mocking Us

Posted on May 5, 2013 by


12 Images That Demonstrate How The New World Order Openly Mocks Us
New World Order, Illuminati Openly Mock Us
If you know what to look for, it quickly becomes obvious that the elite of the world are not even trying to hide their insidious plans for the planet. They hope to unite the entire globe under their leadership, and they don’t think that we are strong enough or smart enough to stop them.
They openly embed symbols expressing their desire for a one world economic system, a one world religion and a one world government on our buildings, on our monuments, and on our money; and they think that it is funny that most people have no idea what those symbols mean.
The New World Order openly mocks us and they seem to take pleasure in giving us “clues” about what their plans are for humanity.

In the “global society” that they have planned for us, individual freedoms and liberties will be greatly restricted “for the good of humanity” and they will use the emerging Big Brother police state control grid to monitor and control everything that we do.

It would be a totalitarian regime unlike anything the world has ever seen. It is absolutely imperative that we wake people up and get them educated about what the globalists plan to do so that they can resist this growing tyranny.
The following are 12 pictures that demonstrate how the New World Order openly mocks us….

Wenlock – Official Mascot Of The 2012 London Olympics

On the official London 2012 website, we are told that Wenlock, the official mascot of the 2012 London Olympics, has a camera for an eye because that “lets Wenlock record everything”.
How creepy is that?
No matter what Wenlock is doing, he is always watching and always recording.
Olympics Mascots - New World Order, Illuminati Openly Mock Us

A recent Vanity Fair article by Michael Joseph Gross contained some additional details about Wenlock….

Even the 2012 cartoon mascots, Wenlock and Mandeville, have the notion of surveillance built into their design. Wenlock and Mandeville are two slightly different-shaped silver blobs, meant to be drops of steel taken ‘from the last huge girder of the Olympic Stadium.’ Each of their faces is taken up entirely by a single eye, which is meant to be a camera lens. The packaging for the plush-toy versions of both figures explains, ‘My single eye is like a camera letting me record everything I see.’ (locog has also licensed toy versions of London bobbies and Buckingham Palace guards with camera lenses for faces.) Is the idea of giving children a surveillance toy, I asked Johnson, just a little creepy?

‘Are you referring to Mandeville and Wenlock?’ the mayor replied. ‘The thing that children up and down the country, indeed across the planet, are crying out to their parents to buy them for Christmas? Are you referring to our national icons as creepy? I think that’s—they will be, if they are not already, as cherished and as sought-after as—uh … Schtroumpfs. Or Smurfs. They are the Schtroumpfs du jour. They will be infinitely collectible. What to you is a creepy, monocular, Cyclopean android-type thing is to many children a lovable, hilarious, uh, individual—that will comfort them at night.’

Of course this is going to do nothing to reduce the reputation the UK has for being a Big Brother surveillance society.
In the UK today, there are more surveillance cameras per capita than anywhere else in the world. It has been estimated that there are close to 5 million surveillance cameras in the UK constantly watching every move that people make.
So Wenlock is a perfect mascot for an Olympics to be held in London.

The message that this “cute” little Olympic mascot sends is very clear: Big Brother is watching you.

World Bank Headquarters Art
Robert Wenzel of the Economic Policy Journal recently posted the following two pictures of artwork inside World Bank Headquarters.
World Bank 2 - Illuminati, New World Order Openly Mock UsWorld Bank 1 - Illuminati, New World Order Openly Mock Us

This propaganda is so blatant that even a child should be able to figure it out instantly.
And yet there are lots of people out there that still deny that there is a conspiracy to create a one world economic system.

The Denver Airport Murals
There are plenty of reasons to be creeped out by Denver International Airport, but perhaps the biggest reason is the artwork that is being displayed there. The Denver Airport murals have become world famous, and they convey some very bizarre messages.
For example, this first picture is of a mural entitled “Peace And Harmony With Nature”. But the truth is that this mural does not appear to be very peaceful at all. In fact, it appears to be a funeral for dead children while a fire rages in the background.
A closer look at the dead child on the bottom right of the mural reveals some very disturbing details.
Peace and Harmony With Nature - Illuminati, New World Order Are Mocking Us
As the 
Vigilant Citizen website points out, this dead girl appears to be identified with both Judaism and Christianity.

The girl on the right holds a Bible and a yellow ‘Juden’ star used by the Nazi to identify jews. It seems to symbolize the death of Judeo-Christian beliefs

Is this mural trying to tell us that Judeo-Christian beliefs will be eradicated?
Posted below is another of the famous Denver Airport murals. This one seems to portray some kind of mass extermination.
Denver Airport Murals - Illuminati, New World Order Are Mocking Us

As I have written about previously, the global elite love death. They believe that there are far too many people on the planet and that we are destroying the earth.
The elite desperately want us to stop reproducing, and many of them would openly rejoice if “something” caused the population of the planet to suddenly decline dramatically.

So is that mural trying to send us all a message?
This obsession with population control is also reflected in the next piece of “art” that we are going to examine.

The Georgia Guidestones

The Georgia Guidestones contain ten “new commandments” for humanity to follow.
If you will notice, the number one commandment is to reduce the human population of the planet to less than 500 million people.

But this desire to reduce the global population by more than 90% is not just expressed on this one monument.
As I have written about previously, global leaders associated with the New World Order have been expressing their desire for radical population reduction for many, many years.

The Statue Outside Of EU Headquarters In Brussels, Belgium

The coming world government has been portrayed as a woman riding a beast for ages. It is a very powerful symbol and most educated people know what it stands for.
Well, guess what is standing right outside of EU headquarters in Brussels, Belgium?
A giant statue of a woman riding a beast.
The woman is supposed to represent the pagan goddess Europa, and the beast is supposed to represent the pagan god Zeus. In the original mythology, Europa and Zeus become lovers.

The pagan god Zeus is commonly associated with the entity known as Lucifer or Satan. In the end, Europa (Europe) will be proudly riding high as a partner in the world system that has been established by Lucifer.
For those that understand what this really means, this image should make you sick.
Europa Statue - New World Order, Illuminati Are Mocking Us

European Coins
This symbolism also shows up on European money

For example, the following is a picture of a 2 euro coin minted for Greece that has the same symbolism of a woman riding the beast.

Euro Coin - New World Order, Illuminati Are Openly Mocking Us

Magazine Covers

A woman riding a beast has also been used to represent Europe by some of the most prominent mainstream publications on the continent.
For example, check out the following cover that Der Spiegel once ran…

The Tower Of Babel

But a woman riding a beast is not the only symbology that the EU has pulled directly out of ancient traditions.
Posted below is an image of an official poster that was used to promote the EU Parliament before it was withdrawn due to public outcry.
It clearly portrays the EU as an attempt to restart the work that the builders of the Tower of Babel began.
So who originally constructed the Tower of Babel?
Well, according to tradition, it was actually a ruler named Nimrod that began construction of the Tower of Babel. From his home base in Babylon, he attempted to establish the very first global government.
Nimrod was a very important figure in ancient history. Many of the pagan religious practices that spread throughout the ancient world originated with the ancient Babylonian religion of Nimrod.
In fact, many of our most notable secret societies today trace their origins all the way back to Nimrod. According to some traditions, the very first Freemason was Nimrod.
So for the EU to purposely choose the symbology of the Tower of Babel and Nimrod to represent themselves is very powerful indeed.

The Great Seal

Most Americans have no idea, but there is also very powerful New World Order symbolism on U.S. currency.
For example, on the back of every one dollar bill is the Great Seal of the United States.
At the bottom of the Great Seal, we find these words: “Novus Ordo Seclorum.”
When translated, that means a “new secular order” or a “new order for the ages.”
Next time you pull out a dollar bill, flip it over and take a look for yourself.

So who is heading up this “new order?”
Well, on the Great Seal we can see a capstone descending to finish the pyramid with an “all-seeing eye” on it.
According to Wikipedia, imagery of an all-seeing eye “can be traced back to Egyptian mythology and the Eye of Horus.”
Manly P. Hall, one of the most famous Freemasons of all time, believed that a triangle with an all-seeing eye is a very powerful ancient symbol that has been passed down to us through the secret societies.

On the reverse of our nation’s Great Seal is an unfinished pyramid to represent human society itself, imperfect and incomplete. Above floats the symbol of the esoteric orders, the radiant triangle with its all-seeing eye.
There is only one possible origin for these symbols, and that is the secret societies which came to this country 150 years before the Revolutionary War. There can be no question that the great seal was directly inspired by these orders of the human Quest, and that it set forth the purpose for this nation. -Manly P. Hall, The Secret Destiny of America, pp. 174, 181.

Throughout history, various esoteric traditions have associated Horus with both Nimrod and Lucifer. The Great Seal is definitely referring to a “god”, but it is not the God of Christianity.
The first portion of the motto on the Great Seal, Annuit Coeptis, is commonly translated as follows: “he approves of the undertakings.”
So, in essence, the real message of the Great Seal is that Horus (Lucifer) approves of the establishment of a “new order for the ages.”

Today, the elite of the world hope to finally establish this “new order” over the entire globe.
That is why they are constantly seeking to bring the economies of the world together, to bring the religions of the world together, and to strengthen institutions involved in “global governance” such as the United Nations.
It is incredibly important that we get people educated about all of this.
One of the most prominent mottos used in ancient secret societies such as Freemasonry is “ordo ab chao” (“order from chaos”).
In the years ahead, there is going to be mass chaos on a global scale.
Out of that incredible chaos, the global elite hope to pick up the pieces and finally establish their “New World Order”.

This article first appeared here at the American Dream.  Michael Snyder is a writer, speaker and activist who writes and edits his own blogs The American Dream and Economic Collapse Blog. Follow him on Twitter here.

Related articles

In My Opinion, way overdue!   “X”  –  I colored the font.

It’s time the United States make English their official language.

That is the sentiment of more than one hundred lawmakers who have added their names as co-sponsors to the “English Language Unity Act of 2011” (H.R. 997), introduced by Rep. Steve King (R-IA). In addition to becoming the official language of the U.S., the legislation would also “establish a uniform English language rule for naturalization.”

“I don’t know what the Republican leaders have on the board that is more popular than official English,” said King to the Hill.

The move to make English the official language of the United States is not something new — or without critics. Many Democrats believe this latest effort is little more than a political effort designed to paint President Obama in a bad light since he voted against a similar measure when he was a Senator.

Three years ago, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) referred to a nearly identical bill as “racist.”

The Leftists who are running this country and trying desperately to re-shape our nation into something our forefathers wouldn’t even recognize need to be painted in a negative light.

Though our nation was indeed built on the backs of hard working immigrants who spoke dozens of different languages and dialects, they all knew the importance and necessity of learning the English language as a unifying measure, a sign of assimilation and belonging.

That is missing today, and our nation suffers because of it.

That’s why Grassfire Nation has launched a national petition initiative supporting Rep. King’s legislation to make English the official language of the United States.

We are asking all members of our team to get on board with this effort by clicking below and signing our petition:


+ + 100,000 Petitions Needed for Immediate Delivery

Several previous efforts to establish English as our official language have all failed. However, we believe the climate right for this legislation.

King has bi-partisan support of the House.

All he’s missing is a strong contingent of grassroots citizens mobilized to move Congress forward with this long-overdue legislation — bringing us closer to unifying our nation by adopting English as our official language!

Grassfire officials will be reaching out to Rep. King in the near future to make ourselves available to him and those supporting this legislation. As soon as we reach our delivery goal, we will hand-deliver all gathered petitions to key members of Congress!

Be among those patriotic Americans who are diligently efforting to make English our official language by signing our petition:


Gds44’s Blog

“The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not,” warned Thomas Jefferson.

Allen West to Democrats: Get your leftism the hell out of America! » The Right Scoop –

January 29, 2012 Leave a Comment 

Allen West to Democrats: Get your leftism the hell out of America! » The Right Scoop –.

Allen West spoke at the Palm Beach County GOP Party Lincoln Day Dinner tonight, and it was a fabulous speech. In typical Allen West fashion, he doesn’t hold back as he tells Obama, Pelosi, Reid, and DWS to get their leftist message the hell out of the United States of America:

This is a battlefield that we must stand upon. And we need to let President Obama, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, and my dear friend the Chairman of the Democrat National Committee, we need to let them know that Florida ain’t on the table. Take your message of equality of achievement, take your message of economic dependency, take your message of enslaving the entrepreneurial will and spirit of the American people somewhere else! You can take it to Europe, you can take it to the bottom of the sea, you can take it to the North Pole, but get the hell out of the United States of America!

Here’s the full speech:


Related articles
%d bloggers like this: